Triple
T5292144
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | law of attraction |
E119765
|
entity |
| Predicate | claimedEffect |
P16215
|
FINISHED |
| Object | manifestation of wealth |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: manifestation of wealth | Statement: [law of attraction, claimedEffect, manifestation of wealth]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimedEffect Context triple: [law of attraction, claimedEffect, manifestation of wealth]
-
A.
claimed
chosen
Indicates that an entity has asserted or stated something as true, often without definitive proof or verification.
-
B.
notableEffect
Indicates that one entity has a significant impact, consequence, or influence on another entity or situation.
-
C.
claimedRight
Indicates that an entity asserts or demands a right or entitlement in relation to another entity or resource.
-
D.
claimedAs
Indicates that one entity asserts ownership, authorship, responsibility, or some other form of association over another entity.
-
E.
claimedFor
Indicates that one entity has asserted ownership, responsibility, or entitlement over or on behalf of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446de5648190b313a90bd96730d2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd8682d18c8190bbb35cc75c8a7c12 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd844dfdac819086efedd1cbebff84 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:52 p.m.