Triple
T5287783
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | His Grace |
E119663
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalPrecedent |
P63309
|
FINISHED |
| Object | title and name of the duke |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: title and name of the duke | Statement: [His Grace, typicalPrecedent, title and name of the duke]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalPrecedent Context triple: [His Grace, typicalPrecedent, title and name of the duke]
-
A.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
-
B.
precedentSystem
Indicates that one legal system or framework serves as a source of precedent or authoritative guidance for another system.
-
C.
precedentFor
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
D.
modifiedPrecedent
Indicates that one entity has altered, qualified, or changed the terms, scope, or interpretation of a prior decision, rule, or precedent.
-
E.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446de5648190b313a90bd96730d2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd8682d18c8190bbb35cc75c8a7c12 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd844dfdac819086efedd1cbebff84 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd86800630819096dad2eb2248c372 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:52 p.m.