Triple
T5285275
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Christian Faith |
E119601
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewOfDoctrine |
P5485
|
FINISHED |
| Object | expression of Christian self-consciousness |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: expression of Christian self-consciousness | Statement: [The Christian Faith, viewOfDoctrine, expression of Christian self-consciousness]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOfDoctrine Context triple: [The Christian Faith, viewOfDoctrine, expression of Christian self-consciousness]
-
A.
concernsDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that something is related or pertains specifically to a particular doctrine or set of doctrinal principles.
-
B.
developedDoctrine
Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
-
C.
proposesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or advocates a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles for consideration or adoption by others.
-
D.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
-
E.
appliedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446de5648190b313a90bd96730d2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd8c9c72b08190947b6b955ac1bb5a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 6:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd844a56b48190ad743c42246e02dd |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:52 p.m.