Triple
T5273063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Omen (1976 film score) |
E119306
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasVocalForces |
P62769
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mixed choir |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mixed choir | Statement: [The Omen (1976 film score), hasVocalForces, mixed choir]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasVocalForces Context triple: [The Omen (1976 film score), hasVocalForces, mixed choir]
-
A.
vocalForces
Indicates a relationship where one entity uses vocal expression (such as speech, singing, or sound) to exert influence, pressure, or compulsion on another entity.
-
B.
hasVocals
Indicates that the subject includes or features vocal elements, such as singing or spoken voice, rather than being purely instrumental or non-vocal.
-
C.
hasVoiceIn
Indicates that an entity participates by providing a voice role or vocal performance in another entity, such as a work, production, or recording.
-
D.
vocalizationCharacteristic
Indicates how an entity’s vocal sounds are characterized, such as their quality, style, or distinctive acoustic features.
-
E.
vocalizationMethod
Indicates the manner or technique by which an entity produces a sound or vocal expression.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446c38e081908cdaf113bdf86790 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7d5a23908190a24e79d1b29d6fcf |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77c71268819094f9f5203eed392d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd7d5906d88190b805977e5a05767a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:51 p.m.