Triple

T5271677
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Adam E119271 entity
Predicate secondarySetting P62757 FINISHED
Object Tangier (via Eve) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tangier (via Eve) | Statement: [Adam, secondarySetting, Tangier (via Eve)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondarySetting
Context triple: [Adam, secondarySetting, Tangier (via Eve)]
  • A. secondaryTo
    Indicates that one condition, event, or factor occurs as a consequence of, or is caused by, another primary condition, event, or factor.
  • B. secondaryFunction
    Indicates that an entity has an additional, supporting role or purpose beyond its primary function.
  • C. secondarySee
    Indicates that one entity is referenced as an additional or alternative point of consultation or viewing in relation to another entity.
  • D. primarySetting
    Indicates that one entity serves as the main or central location, context, or environment in which the other entity’s events or activities primarily take place.
  • E. secondaryTarget
    Indicates that an entity serves as an additional or subordinate target in relation to a primary target within a given context or action.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd446c38e081908cdaf113bdf86790 completed March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd7d5a23908190a24e79d1b29d6fcf completed March 20, 2026, 5:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd77c71268819094f9f5203eed392d completed March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd7d5906d88190b805977e5a05767a completed March 20, 2026, 5:01 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:51 p.m.