Triple

T5257132
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nissan Rogue E118727 entity
Predicate competitor P1375 FINISHED
Object Mazda CX-5 E395831 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mazda CX-5 | Statement: [Nissan Rogue, competitor, Mazda CX-5]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mazda CX-5
Context triple: [Nissan Rogue, competitor, Mazda CX-5]
  • A. Mazda CX-5 chosen
    The Mazda CX-5 is a compact crossover SUV known for its stylish design, engaging driving dynamics, and efficient Skyactiv technology.
  • B. Mazda CX-30
    The Mazda CX-30 is a compact crossover SUV known for its sleek design, upscale interior, and engaging driving dynamics within Mazda’s lineup.
  • C. Mazda CX-9
    The Mazda CX-9 is a mid-size three-row crossover SUV known for its stylish design, upscale interior, and engaging driving dynamics.
  • D. Mazda3
    The Mazda3 is a popular compact car known for its sporty handling, stylish design, and well-appointed interior.
  • E. Mazda6
    The Mazda6 is a mid-size family sedan known for its sporty handling, stylish design, and strong value in the mainstream car market.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd446978108190bb5f9c5c23d93f88 completed March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd7ba64fe48190943e7d49f6e1449a completed March 20, 2026, 4:53 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69befe7ded18819094f86cfff458953c completed March 21, 2026, 8:24 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:50 p.m.