Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999) | Statement: [Roe (party in Saenz v. Roe), namedIn, Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999)]

Target entity: Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999)
Context triple: [Roe (party in Saenz v. Roe), namedIn, Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999)]

• A. Saenz v. Roe chosen
  Saenz v. Roe is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down California’s welfare residency requirements and reaffirmed the constitutional right to travel under the Fourteenth Amendment.
• B. City of Boerne v. Flores
  City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
• C. Goss v. Lopez
  Goss v. Lopez is a 1975 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held public school students are entitled to due process protections, such as notice and a hearing, before being suspended.
• D. South Dakota v. Dole
  South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
• E. Eisenstadt v. Baird
  Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.