Triple
T5256561
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Roe (party in Saenz v. Roe) |
E118713
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedToLegalDoctrine |
P41967
|
FINISHED |
| Object | right to travel |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: right to travel | Statement: [Roe (party in Saenz v. Roe), relatedToLegalDoctrine, right to travel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedToLegalDoctrine Context triple: [Roe (party in Saenz v. Roe), relatedToLegalDoctrine, right to travel]
-
A.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
B.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
isRelevantToDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that something has a meaningful connection or applicability to a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs.
-
E.
coexistingLegalTradition
Indicates that multiple legal traditions or systems exist and operate simultaneously within the same social or institutional context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446978108190bb5f9c5c23d93f88 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7ba4ecd88190800b5e4eea3abed5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77c30bac8190a883ca45da35d667 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:50 p.m.