Triple
T5256242
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carathéodory’s extension theorem |
E118705
|
entity |
| Predicate | concludesAbout |
P61768
|
FINISHED |
| Object | measure |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: measure | Statement: [Carathéodory’s extension theorem, concludesAbout, measure]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: concludesAbout Context triple: [Carathéodory’s extension theorem, concludesAbout, measure]
-
A.
concludes
Indicates that one entity brings something (such as an event, process, or discussion) to an end or reaches a final decision or judgment about it.
-
B.
concludedThat
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
-
C.
concludedBy
Indicates that an event, process, or state is brought to an end or finalized by a specific agent or entity.
-
D.
concluded
Indicates that an entity has brought an event, process, discussion, or agreement to an end, often after reaching a decision or final judgment.
-
E.
concludedWith
Indicates that an event, process, or interaction ended or was finalized by a specific outcome, action, or state.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446978108190bb5f9c5c23d93f88 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7ba4ecd88190800b5e4eea3abed5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77c30bac8190a883ca45da35d667 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd787975788190848ffbac87896efe |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:40 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:50 p.m.