Triple
T5252502
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Navarro County, Texas |
E118620
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Town of Dawson, Texas
The Town of Dawson is a small rural community in central Texas known for its agricultural roots and close-knit local character.
|
E506365
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Town of Dawson, Texas | Statement: [Navarro County, Texas, contains, Town of Dawson, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Town of Dawson, Texas Context triple: [Navarro County, Texas, contains, Town of Dawson, Texas]
-
A.
Cottonwood, Texas
Cottonwood, Texas is a small rural community located within Kaufman County in the state of Texas.
-
B.
Dodd City, Texas
Dodd City, Texas is a small rural town located in Fannin County in northeastern Texas.
-
C.
Rio Vista, Texas
Rio Vista, Texas is a small rural city in North Texas known for its close-knit community and agricultural surroundings.
-
D.
Tolar, Texas
Tolar, Texas is a small rural city in Hood County known for its tight-knit community and location within the Granbury–Hood County area of North Central Texas.
-
E.
Maypearl, Texas
Maypearl, Texas is a small rural city in North Texas known for its close-knit community and agricultural surroundings southwest of Dallas.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Town of Dawson, Texas Triple: [Navarro County, Texas, contains, Town of Dawson, Texas]
Generated description
The Town of Dawson is a small rural community in central Texas known for its agricultural roots and close-knit local character.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Town of Dawson, Texas Target entity description: The Town of Dawson is a small rural community in central Texas known for its agricultural roots and close-knit local character.
-
A.
Cottonwood, Texas
Cottonwood, Texas is a small rural community located within Kaufman County in the state of Texas.
-
B.
Dodd City, Texas
Dodd City, Texas is a small rural town located in Fannin County in northeastern Texas.
-
C.
Rio Vista, Texas
Rio Vista, Texas is a small rural city in North Texas known for its close-knit community and agricultural surroundings.
-
D.
Tolar, Texas
Tolar, Texas is a small rural city in Hood County known for its tight-knit community and location within the Granbury–Hood County area of North Central Texas.
-
E.
Maypearl, Texas
Maypearl, Texas is a small rural city in North Texas known for its close-knit community and agricultural surroundings southwest of Dallas.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446978108190bb5f9c5c23d93f88 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7b7cd7f4819098e591df07564a52 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69befe72c91c8190ab0f988dca420399 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69beff668dbc8190bc71c8dae2b5ca72 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 8:28 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69bf00120fe88190817badb72977566e |
completed | March 21, 2026, 8:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:50 p.m.