Triple
T5238303
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fairfield City Council |
E118277
|
entity |
| Predicate | jurisdiction |
P82
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fairfield, Alabama |
E21541
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fairfield, Alabama | Statement: [Fairfield City Council, jurisdiction, Fairfield, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fairfield, Alabama Context triple: [Fairfield City Council, jurisdiction, Fairfield, Alabama]
-
A.
Fairfield, Alabama
chosen
Fairfield, Alabama is a small city in Jefferson County that functions as a residential and industrial suburb of Birmingham within central Alabama.
-
B.
Sylvania, Alabama
Sylvania, Alabama is a small rural town in northeastern Alabama known for its close-knit community and location atop Sand Mountain.
-
C.
Rockford, Alabama
Rockford, Alabama is a small rural town in central Alabama that serves as the administrative and civic hub of Coosa County.
-
D.
Fayetteville, Alabama
Fayetteville, Alabama is an unincorporated rural community located in Shelby County in the central part of the state.
-
E.
Riverview, Alabama
Riverview, Alabama is a small town located in Escambia County in the southern part of the U.S. state of Alabama.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4467db0881909b3b0982df32cc8f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7b290b88819095bc99c234260d25 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:51 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c04c916df08190a95e3320ab364b52 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:49 p.m.