Triple

T5237680
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject tablelands E118262 entity
Predicate mayBeCappedBy P62314 FINISHED
Object resistant rock layers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: resistant rock layers | Statement: [tablelands, mayBeCappedBy, resistant rock layers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeCappedBy
Context triple: [tablelands, mayBeCappedBy, resistant rock layers]
  • A. capped
    Indicates that one entity has placed a limit or maximum boundary on another entity’s quantity, value, or extent.
  • B. canBeExceededIn
    Indicates that one entity’s value, level, or extent is capable of being surpassed by that of another entity within a specified context.
  • C. maximumCapacity
    Indicates the greatest allowable or designed amount of something that an entity can hold, contain, or handle.
  • D. isLimitOf
    Indicates that one quantity, function, or sequence approaches a particular value as its input or index approaches some specified point or condition.
  • E. hasCapacityTo
    Indicates that one entity possesses the ability, power, or potential to perform an action or bring about a particular effect in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4467db0881909b3b0982df32cc8f completed March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd7b27990c8190b6a3c24de09c8c18 completed March 20, 2026, 4:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd77c1397c8190a7fd844d7a396e54 completed March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd79e9d794819097bb628c603d14af completed March 20, 2026, 4:46 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:49 p.m.