Triple
T5229107
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | White British |
E118063
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalRelevanceIn |
P62483
|
FINISHED |
| Object | anti-discrimination law in the United Kingdom |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: anti-discrimination law in the United Kingdom | Statement: [White British, hasLegalRelevanceIn, anti-discrimination law in the United Kingdom]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalRelevanceIn Context triple: [White British, hasLegalRelevanceIn, anti-discrimination law in the United Kingdom]
-
A.
hasLegalSubject
Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
-
B.
hasLegalEffect
Indicates that an action, document, or condition produces recognized legal consequences or enforceable rights and obligations.
-
C.
hasLegalIssue
Indicates that an entity is involved in, associated with, or subject to a legal problem, dispute, or proceeding.
-
D.
hasLegalForceIn
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
-
E.
jurisprudenceDiscussedIn
Indicates that a topic, issue, or principle of jurisprudence is examined, analyzed, or debated within a particular document, discussion, or source.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4466fb8c819083b806a79414d7e4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7b0093a88190aba381ba3f761408 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77bf1ef08190bb3487b3f3ee088c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd7aff0244819085c4799793ed0185 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:51 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:48 p.m.