Triple
T522298
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Agecroft |
E10843
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLandUseHistory |
P2417
|
FINISHED |
| Object | coal mining |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: coal mining | Statement: [Agecroft, hasLandUseHistory, coal mining]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLandUseHistory Context triple: [Agecroft, hasLandUseHistory, coal mining]
-
A.
hasHistoricalEntity
Indicates a relationship where one entity includes, references, or is associated with another entity that existed or is defined in a past historical context.
-
B.
historicallyUsedFor
chosen
Indicates that something served a particular function or purpose at some point in the past, even if it may no longer be used that way now.
-
C.
hasHistoricalContext
Indicates that something is related to, influenced by, or best understood in light of specific past events, conditions, or time periods.
-
D.
hasHistoricalOrigin
Indicates that something originated, was first established, or came into existence during a specific historical period or context.
-
E.
hasHistoricDistrict
Indicates that an entity possesses or contains a designated historic district within its boundaries or domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e84b16c4819088d284c47c3a7968 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f1b372408190b3918fec45444674 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2f018129c81909494450fcba71b59 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.