Triple

T5220494
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rehnquist Court E117854 entity
Predicate landmarkDecision P6504 FINISHED
Object Seminole Tribe v. Florida E114954 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Seminole Tribe v. Florida | Statement: [Rehnquist Court, landmarkDecision, Seminole Tribe v. Florida]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Seminole Tribe v. Florida
Context triple: [Rehnquist Court, landmarkDecision, Seminole Tribe v. Florida]
  • A. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida chosen
    Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited Congress’s power to subject non-consenting states to lawsuits in federal court, reinforcing state sovereign immunity.
  • B. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
    Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.
  • C. Chisholm v. Georgia
    Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
  • D. Fletcher v. Peck
    Fletcher v. Peck was an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that for the first time struck down a state law as unconstitutional, helping define the scope of the Contract Clause and judicial review over state legislation.
  • E. Jackson v. Georgia
    Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4465e03081909bfcfd7113062590 completed March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd847049648190ab24693e92f0dad1 completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69bef8059c808190aac709a199541ce7 completed March 21, 2026, 7:56 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:48 p.m.