Triple
T5217063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | High Commissioner for Egypt |
E117778
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British colonial administrator position |
C10373
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: British colonial administrator position Context triple: [High Commissioner for Egypt, instanceOf, British colonial administrator position]
-
A.
British colonial administrator
A British colonial administrator is an official appointed by the British government to govern, manage, and implement imperial policies in overseas colonies, overseeing local administration, law, and economic exploitation.
-
B.
British civil service position
A British civil service position is a professional role within the UK government’s permanent administrative machinery, responsible for implementing policies, delivering public services, and supporting ministers in their official duties.
-
C.
British civil servant
A British civil servant is a non-political government employee who supports the administration and implementation of public policy within the United Kingdom’s civil service.
-
D.
British colonial position
chosen
A British colonial position is an official role or office established by the British Empire to administer, govern, or oversee territories and populations under colonial rule.
-
E.
British Indian administrative body
A British Indian administrative body is a colonial-era governing institution established by the British in India to manage political, legal, and economic affairs on behalf of the imperial government.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4464ba3c8190bc16b2ebbe42ddb0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:48 p.m.