Triple
T521658
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Neoclassicism |
E10828
|
entity |
| Predicate | aestheticIdeal |
P12802
|
FINISHED |
| Object | noble simplicity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: noble simplicity | Statement: [Neoclassicism, aestheticIdeal, noble simplicity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: aestheticIdeal Context triple: [Neoclassicism, aestheticIdeal, noble simplicity]
-
A.
appearance
Indicates how something looks or seems to an observer, including its visible form, condition, or outward impression.
-
B.
viewsAsVirtue
chosen
Indicates that one entity regards a particular trait, behavior, or quality as a moral virtue.
-
C.
artisticStyle
Indicates the artistic movement, style, or aesthetic approach that characterizes how something is created or visually expressed.
-
D.
adaptationAppearance
Indicates that one entity appears or is depicted in an adaptation of another entity (such as a work being represented in a derived or reinterpreted version).
-
E.
artisticIntention
Indicates that an action or creation is guided by a deliberate artistic purpose, concept, or expressive goal of its creator.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e84b16c4819088d284c47c3a7968 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f1b372408190b3918fec45444674 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2f018129c81909494450fcba71b59 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.