Triple
T5212210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Weyl’s gauge theory |
E117659
|
entity |
| Predicate | inspiredConcept |
P29525
|
FINISHED |
| Object | modern gauge theories |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: modern gauge theories | Statement: [Weyl’s gauge theory, inspiredConcept, modern gauge theories]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inspiredConcept Context triple: [Weyl’s gauge theory, inspiredConcept, modern gauge theories]
-
A.
inspirationConcept
chosen
Indicates that one concept serves as a source of inspiration or creative influence for another concept.
-
B.
inspiredByPhrase
Indicates that one entity’s creation, idea, or expression is motivated or shaped by the content or wording of a particular phrase.
-
C.
inspiredWorks
Indicates that one work served as a source of inspiration or creative influence for the creation or development of another work.
-
D.
inspiredField
Indicates that one entity served as a source of inspiration or influence for the development, direction, or characteristics of a particular field or domain.
-
E.
featuredConcept
Indicates that one concept is highlighted or given special prominence relative to others in a particular context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4464ba3c8190bc16b2ebbe42ddb0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7a730e6c8190ae6082da41ee592a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77bb4e8c819094b5ac7cf61512f9 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:47 p.m.