Triple
T5207906
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | George Leigh-Mallory |
E117556
|
entity |
| Predicate | questionedFact |
P62024
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Whether he reached the summit of Mount Everest before his death is unknown |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Whether he reached the summit of Mount Everest before his death is unknown | Statement: [George Leigh-Mallory, questionedFact, Whether he reached the summit of Mount Everest before his death is unknown]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: questionedFact Context triple: [George Leigh-Mallory, questionedFact, Whether he reached the summit of Mount Everest before his death is unknown]
-
A.
fact
Indicates that something is objectively true or has actually occurred, independent of opinion or belief.
-
B.
questionedAttribution
Indicates that the correctness or source of an attribution between entities is being challenged or called into doubt.
-
C.
factFinding
Indicates a process of gathering and verifying information or evidence to determine the truth about a situation or claim.
-
D.
questionedCharacter
Indicates that one entity directed questions or an interrogation toward another entity.
-
E.
contradictedTheory
Indicates that one entity has presented evidence, arguments, or findings that oppose, challenge, or invalidate the theory proposed by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4463dd3c81909966123f20b79d57 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7a6d70d081908c74e86b3bca9ba2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77bb4e8c819094b5ac7cf61512f9 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd79000cf88190b3c05d95395b0cd2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:47 p.m.