Triple
T5182170
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Darius the Mede |
E116945
|
entity |
| Predicate | lawCharacteristicInText |
P61937
|
FINISHED |
| Object | law which cannot be revoked |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: law which cannot be revoked | Statement: [Darius the Mede, lawCharacteristicInText, law which cannot be revoked]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lawCharacteristicInText Context triple: [Darius the Mede, lawCharacteristicInText, law which cannot be revoked]
-
A.
legalCharacterization
Indicates how an action, event, or situation is classified or characterized under a specific legal framework or set of laws.
-
B.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
C.
legalContent
Indicates that the associated material complies with applicable laws and regulations and is permitted for use, distribution, or display.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
legalContext
Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446140f08190becb93c61158f27f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd799bc58c819098a8e91e21baaef4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77b7e8b4819092ec3965e11f2dea |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd78d6a1388190804dcf568ca92129 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:46 p.m.