Triple
T5181739
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kayser-i Rûm |
E116936
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedInDiplomacyWith |
P18759
|
FINISHED |
| Object | European powers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: European powers | Statement: [Kayser-i Rûm, usedInDiplomacyWith, European powers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInDiplomacyWith Context triple: [Kayser-i Rûm, usedInDiplomacyWith, European powers]
-
A.
usedInDiplomacy
chosen
Indicates that something is employed as a tool, method, or resource within diplomatic interactions or negotiations between parties.
-
B.
usedInDiplomaticCompromiseBetween
Indicates that something serves as a means, tool, or element employed in achieving a diplomatic compromise between two or more parties.
-
C.
diplomaticPolicy
Indicates the stance, strategy, or set of guiding principles an entity adopts in managing its diplomatic relations and interactions with others.
-
D.
diplomaticRelation
Indicates a formal relationship of negotiation, communication, or representation between political entities, typically states or governments.
-
E.
diplomaticRelationBetween
Indicates the existence of a formal diplomatic relationship or ties between two political entities or states.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446140f08190becb93c61158f27f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd799bc58c819098a8e91e21baaef4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77b529948190b86671ebe43f4734 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:45 p.m.