Triple
T5179239
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Des Moines County, Iowa |
E116876
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBorderWith |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Illinois |
E13723
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Illinois | Statement: [Des Moines County, Iowa, hasBorderWith, Illinois]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Illinois Context triple: [Des Moines County, Iowa, hasBorderWith, Illinois]
-
A.
Illinois
chosen
Illinois is a Midwestern U.S. state known for its major metropolis Chicago, diverse economy, and significant political and transportation influence.
-
B.
Como, Illinois
Como, Illinois is a small unincorporated community in Whiteside County that forms part of the Sterling Micropolitan Statistical Area.
-
C.
Illinois and Indiana
Illinois and Indiana are neighboring Midwestern U.S. states whose shared boundary is partly defined by the Ohio River.
-
D.
Indiana
Indiana is a U.S. state known for its manufacturing base, rich agricultural land, and iconic events like the Indianapolis 500.
-
E.
Iowa and Illinois
Iowa and Illinois are neighboring Midwestern U.S. states whose shared eastern and western boundaries, respectively, are largely defined by the Mississippi River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446140f08190becb93c61158f27f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd79978a208190b2e5909795108327 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bed912629c8190beffde376f0aedc7 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 5:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:45 p.m.