Triple
T5170325
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Selma, California |
E116660
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAgriculturalSector |
P25683
|
FINISHED |
| Object | viticulture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: viticulture | Statement: [Selma, California, hasAgriculturalSector, viticulture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAgriculturalSector Context triple: [Selma, California, hasAgriculturalSector, viticulture]
-
A.
hasAgriculturalProduction
chosen
Indicates that an entity engages in or is characterized by the production of agricultural goods such as crops or livestock.
-
B.
hasRuralEconomySector
Indicates that an entity participates in, contains, or is associated with an economic sector based on rural activities or rural development.
-
C.
hasAgriculturalCharacter
Indicates that something possesses qualities, features, or uses typical of agriculture or farming activities.
-
D.
representsAgriculture
Indicates that one entity serves as an example, instance, or embodiment of agriculture in relation to another entity.
-
E.
hasIndustrialSector
Indicates that an entity is associated with, operates in, or belongs to a particular industrial sector or branch of economic activity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd445ff97c81909a2615cc56235470 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd794f44248190a3a90c92208104a7 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77b36c008190b91011a9fa52b3d2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:45 p.m.