Triple

T5163888
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MixBit E116501 entity
Predicate wasPositionedAs P49062 FINISHED
Object competitor to Vine LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: competitor to Vine | Statement: [MixBit, wasPositionedAs, competitor to Vine]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasPositionedAs
Context triple: [MixBit, wasPositionedAs, competitor to Vine]
  • A. initiallyPositionedAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity’s starting or original position is specified relative to another entity or reference frame.
  • B. tookPositionOn
    Indicates that an entity expressed or adopted a specific stance, opinion, or viewpoint regarding a particular issue, topic, or subject.
  • C. positionedAgainst
    Indicates that one entity is placed so that it directly faces or is set opposite to another entity, often in close or contacting alignment.
  • D. hasPositionOn
    Indicates that one entity occupies or holds a specific role, job, or spatial location relative to another entity.
  • E. losesPositionAs
    Indicates that one entity ceases to hold or occupy a particular role, status, or position in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd445edb3881909b93b34d260717fc completed March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd792936d48190825da8826448c1da completed March 20, 2026, 4:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd77b36c008190b91011a9fa52b3d2 completed March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:44 p.m.