Triple
T5160511
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | How Low |
E116423
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRemix |
P9639
|
FINISHED |
| Object | How Low (official remix) |
E116423
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: How Low (official remix) | Statement: [How Low, hasRemix, How Low (official remix)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: How Low (official remix) Context triple: [How Low, hasRemix, How Low (official remix)]
-
A.
How Low
chosen
"How Low" is a popular hip-hop single by American rapper Ludacris, known for its catchy hook and heavy club-oriented production.
-
B.
Lay Low
"Lay Low" is a popular West Coast hip hop track by Snoop Dogg featuring Nate Dogg, Master P, and others, known for its smooth G-funk production and laid-back gangsta rap vibe.
-
C.
L.O.V.E. (Remix)
"L.O.V.E. (Remix)" is a reworked version of the song "L.O.V.E." featured on the album "Elevation."
-
D.
Go Gone (Remix)
"Go Gone (Remix)" is a remixed version of Estelle's song "Go Gone," featured on her debut album *The 18th Day*.
-
E.
So Emotional (remix)
"So Emotional (remix)" is a remixed version of Whitney Houston’s hit song "So Emotional," featured on her compilation album "Whitney: The Greatest Hits."
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd445edb3881909b93b34d260717fc |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd79073a54819080cd1e8de6fe906a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:42 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bed92b3ab48190900cf5c246dba433 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:44 p.m.