Triple
T5142967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eve |
E116002
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipTypeWithAdam |
P10690
|
FINISHED |
| Object | romantic partner |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic partner | Statement: [Eve, relationshipTypeWithAdam, romantic partner]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithAdam Context triple: [Eve, relationshipTypeWithAdam, romantic partner]
-
A.
relationshipType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
B.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
C.
basisOfRelationship
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational reason, cause, or justification for the relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
D.
identityRelation
Indicates that two entities are in fact the very same entity, not merely similar or equivalent.
-
E.
historicalRelationship
Indicates a relationship that existed between entities in the past, often tied to a specific historical period, context, or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4446c0e08190a7c29dc74976bf03 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd78d7f4d081908d59adcd86f52f1d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77ae2f10819098bb8939106e1281 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:43 p.m.