Triple
T510903
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Petit Verdot |
E10604
|
entity |
| Predicate | vinification |
P14224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | often aged in oak |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: often aged in oak | Statement: [Petit Verdot, vinification, often aged in oak]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vinification Context triple: [Petit Verdot, vinification, often aged in oak]
-
A.
wineStyle
Indicates the stylistic category or type of wine (such as its production style, sweetness, body, or other defining characteristics) associated with an entity.
-
B.
wineAgeingPotential
Indicates the capacity or suitability of a wine to improve in quality or maintain desirable characteristics over time with proper aging.
-
C.
viticultureHistory
Indicates the historical development, practices, and events related to grape cultivation and winemaking over time.
-
D.
viticulturalCharacteristic
Indicates a relationship where a specific trait, quality, or property is attributed to viticulture or grape-growing practices.
-
E.
primaryGrapeVariety
Indicates that one entity is the main or predominant grape variety used in producing the other entity (typically a wine or wine-based product).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e84a0d08819087e01863fcd9abf1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f165b91c81908c2d2ba15c64b956 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edfe236481909901cc7d4281b33c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2eebc89e8819081fd20beb80fe0ee |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.