Triple
T5100458
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Third Home Rule Bill |
E114968
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedInParliament |
P61104
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1912 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1912 | Statement: [Third Home Rule Bill, introducedInParliament, 1912]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedInParliament Context triple: [Third Home Rule Bill, introducedInParliament, 1912]
-
A.
usedInParliament
Indicates that something (such as a procedure, term, rule, or item) is employed or applied within the context of a parliamentary body or its activities.
-
B.
introducedInLegislatureBy
Indicates that a piece of legislation was formally presented or sponsored in a legislative body by a specific legislator or legislative entity.
-
C.
representedInParliamentSince
Indicates that an entity has held representation in a parliament continuously from a specified starting time.
-
D.
parliamentaryInvolvement
Indicates involvement or participation of an entity in the activities, processes, or functions of a parliament or parliamentary body.
-
E.
existedDuringParliament
Indicates that an entity’s existence in time overlapped with the duration of a specific parliamentary term or session.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd443fc49c819089629c00e311310c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd758381dc8190ac491788d27ab8e0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd715e06808190931934dc9930f997 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd738ac2e0819099c06cdcc5e21d28 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.