Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board | Statement: [United States sovereign immunity law, keyCase, College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board]

Target entity: College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
Context triple: [United States sovereign immunity law, keyCase, College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board]

• A. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
  Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
• B. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
  Zelman v. Simmons-Harris is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a school voucher program, ruling that public funds could be used for tuition at religious schools without violating the Establishment Clause.
• C. Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
  Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held student-led, student-initiated prayer at public school football games unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
• D. Agostini v. Felton
  Agostini v. Felton is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that reshaped Establishment Clause doctrine by allowing public school teachers to provide remedial instruction in religious schools under certain safeguards.
• E. Plyler v. Doe
  Plyler v. Doe is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states cannot deny free public education to children based on their immigration status, recognizing such exclusion as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
Triple: [United States sovereign immunity law, keyCase, College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board]

College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s ability to abrogate state sovereign immunity under the Commerce Clause, holding that states cannot be sued for false advertising under federal law without their consent.

Target entity: College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
Target entity description: College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s ability to abrogate state sovereign immunity under the Commerce Clause, holding that states cannot be sued for false advertising under federal law without their consent.

• A. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
  Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
• B. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
  Zelman v. Simmons-Harris is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a school voucher program, ruling that public funds could be used for tuition at religious schools without violating the Establishment Clause.
• C. Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
  Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held student-led, student-initiated prayer at public school football games unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
• D. Agostini v. Felton
  Agostini v. Felton is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that reshaped Establishment Clause doctrine by allowing public school teachers to provide remedial instruction in religious schools under certain safeguards.
• E. Plyler v. Doe
  Plyler v. Doe is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states cannot deny free public education to children based on their immigration status, recognizing such exclusion as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
• F. None of above. chosen