Triple

T5099966
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States sovereign immunity law E114957 entity
Predicate keyCase P4528 FINISHED
Object Hans v. Louisiana E114953 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hans v. Louisiana | Statement: [United States sovereign immunity law, keyCase, Hans v. Louisiana]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Hans v. Louisiana
Context triple: [United States sovereign immunity law, keyCase, Hans v. Louisiana]
  • A. Hans v. Louisiana chosen
    Hans v. Louisiana is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established that a citizen cannot sue their own state in federal court without the state's consent, significantly shaping Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity doctrine.
  • B. Roberts v. Louisiana
    Roberts v. Louisiana is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Gregg v. Georgia, helped define the constitutional limits on capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
  • C. Duncan v. Louisiana
    Duncan v. Louisiana is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • D. Cox v. Louisiana
    Cox v. Louisiana is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to restrict public demonstrations and protected civil rights protest activities under the First Amendment.
  • E. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd443fc49c819089629c00e311310c completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd758381dc8190ac491788d27ab8e0 completed March 20, 2026, 4:27 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69becfc467008190ae704139f21edae2 completed March 21, 2026, 5:05 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.