Triple
T5099861
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alden v. Maine |
E114955
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hans v. Louisiana |
E114953
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hans v. Louisiana | Statement: [Alden v. Maine, relatedCase, Hans v. Louisiana]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hans v. Louisiana Context triple: [Alden v. Maine, relatedCase, Hans v. Louisiana]
-
A.
Hans v. Louisiana
chosen
Hans v. Louisiana is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established that a citizen cannot sue their own state in federal court without the state's consent, significantly shaping Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity doctrine.
-
B.
Roberts v. Louisiana
Roberts v. Louisiana is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Gregg v. Georgia, helped define the constitutional limits on capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
-
C.
Duncan v. Louisiana
Duncan v. Louisiana is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
D.
Cox v. Louisiana
Cox v. Louisiana is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to restrict public demonstrations and protected civil rights protest activities under the First Amendment.
-
E.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd443fc49c819089629c00e311310c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7568e9c881909f114973faef6832 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:27 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bec36d231481908da4d2df53bd6507 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 4:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.