Triple

T5099759
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hans v. Louisiana E114953 entity
Predicate isCitedBy P15322 FINISHED
Object Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer E114956 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer | Statement: [Hans v. Louisiana, isCitedBy, Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
Context triple: [Hans v. Louisiana, isCitedBy, Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer]
  • A. Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer chosen
    Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may, under its Fourteenth Amendment enforcement powers, authorize private lawsuits for money damages against state governments despite Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity.
  • B. Rostker v. Goldberg
    Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
  • C. Nixon v. Fitzgerald
    Nixon v. Fitzgerald is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that established absolute immunity from civil damages liability for a President’s official acts.
  • D. Agostini v. Felton
    Agostini v. Felton is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that reshaped Establishment Clause doctrine by allowing public school teachers to provide remedial instruction in religious schools under certain safeguards.
  • E. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd443fc49c819089629c00e311310c completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd7568e9c881909f114973faef6832 completed March 20, 2026, 4:27 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69beba8977f481908b0d55a9cd28d492 completed March 21, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.