Triple
T5091702
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Crakers |
E114764
|
entity |
| Predicate | conflictWithDesign |
P4897
|
FINISHED |
| Object | gradual emergence of symbolic thought |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gradual emergence of symbolic thought | Statement: [Crakers, conflictWithDesign, gradual emergence of symbolic thought]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conflictWithDesign Context triple: [Crakers, conflictWithDesign, gradual emergence of symbolic thought]
-
A.
conflictWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities are in opposition or disagreement, such that their goals, actions, or states are incompatible or interfere with each other.
-
B.
designIssue
Indicates that there is a problem, flaw, or concern related to the design of an entity or system.
-
C.
conflictedBetween
Indicates being torn or uncertain between two or more options, positions, or commitments.
-
D.
reportedConflict
Indicates that one party has formally reported the existence of a conflict involving another party or situation.
-
E.
hasDesignIntent
Indicates that one entity embodies or reflects the planned purpose, function, or conceptual intent defined by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd443e941881908eb4e8c685b6f656 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7541b2bc8190b58c2a23733b7825 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd715c0a448190afc837c6c31dc6ab |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.