Triple
T5091067
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Astana peace talks |
E114751
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleOfRussia |
P6675
|
FINISHED |
| Object | guarantor state |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: guarantor state | Statement: [Astana peace talks, roleOfRussia, guarantor state]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleOfRussia Context triple: [Astana peace talks, roleOfRussia, guarantor state]
-
A.
geopoliticalRole
chosen
Indicates the specific political or strategic function, status, or position an entity holds within or among geopolitical units such as states, regions, or international organizations.
-
B.
roleDuringColdWar
Indicates the specific position, function, or involvement an entity had in the context of the Cold War period.
-
C.
roleInUSSRDisintegration
Indicates involvement or contribution of an entity to the political, economic, or social processes that led to the disintegration of the USSR.
-
D.
positionOnRussia
Indicates the stance, opinion, or policy that one entity holds regarding Russia.
-
E.
strengthRussia
Indicates a relationship where a level, measure, or display of strength is attributed to or associated with Russia.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd443e941881908eb4e8c685b6f656 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7541b2bc8190b58c2a23733b7825 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd715c0a448190afc837c6c31dc6ab |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.