Triple

T5076982
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shetland sheepdog E114420 entity
Predicate commonMarkings P32310 FINISHED
Object white markings LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: white markings | Statement: [Shetland sheepdog, commonMarkings, white markings]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonMarkings
Context triple: [Shetland sheepdog, commonMarkings, white markings]
  • A. marksOn
    Indicates that one entity bears visible signs, traces, or imprints that have been made or left by another entity.
  • B. distinctiveMarking chosen
    Indicates that one entity bears a unique or distinguishing visual feature or pattern that sets it apart from others.
  • C. reportedMarks
    Indicates that an entity has formally communicated or submitted the marks/grades of another entity (such as a student or assessment) to a relevant party or system.
  • D. mayHaveMarkings
    Indicates that an entity is permitted or able to possess certain markings or distinguishing signs.
  • E. hasMeasurementMarkings
    Indicates that one entity bears visible measurement indicators or scale markings on its surface for quantifying something.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd443dbf908190a9401e9c2dc7bd7d completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd74d3b0088190a658864cb120eef4 completed March 20, 2026, 4:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd7157fe608190b4515d56fdd0a616 completed March 20, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:39 p.m.