Triple
T5071031
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Compassionate Cities |
E114277
|
entity |
| Predicate | seeksToImprove |
P61244
|
FINISHED |
| Object | quality of life in cities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: quality of life in cities | Statement: [Compassionate Cities, seeksToImprove, quality of life in cities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: seeksToImprove Context triple: [Compassionate Cities, seeksToImprove, quality of life in cities]
-
A.
claimsToImprove
Indicates that one entity asserts or promises that it will enhance, benefit, or make another entity better in some way.
-
B.
improvesOn
Indicates that one entity enhances, refines, or performs better than another entity, typically by addressing its limitations or increasing its effectiveness.
-
C.
soughtTo
Indicates that one entity attempted or intended to obtain, achieve, or bring about another entity or outcome.
-
D.
performanceFocus
Indicates that an entity directs attention or effort toward improving or emphasizing performance in a given context.
-
E.
seeksToBuild
Indicates an intention or effort by one entity to create, develop, or establish something.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd443cf28c8190ad371d603563dbdd |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd74a0aa048190ba01281f1b160609 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd7157fe608190b4515d56fdd0a616 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd73d90b608190bd6c2407e84e2b64 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:39 p.m.