Triple

T5066891
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lyon–Grenoble railway E114164 entity
Predicate corridorFor P5520 FINISHED
Object passenger flows between Lyon and Grenoble LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: passenger flows between Lyon and Grenoble | Statement: [Lyon–Grenoble railway, corridorFor, passenger flows between Lyon and Grenoble]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: corridorFor
Context triple: [Lyon–Grenoble railway, corridorFor, passenger flows between Lyon and Grenoble]
  • A. corridorType
    Indicates the specific kind or classification of a corridor associated with an entity or location.
  • B. hasCorridor chosen
    Indicates that one entity includes, is connected by, or provides access through a corridor to another entity.
  • C. corridorOrientation
    Indicates the directional alignment or bearing of a corridor relative to a reference frame or coordinate system.
  • D. corridorRole
    Indicates a relationship where an entity functions as or is assigned the role of a corridor within a spatial or architectural context.
  • E. parallelCorridorFor
    Indicates that one corridor runs alongside and in the same general direction as another corridor, forming a parallel passage.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd443c0c8c81908663b77afb28e165 completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd749bf69c819093e75dce56f1c0ab completed March 20, 2026, 4:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd715622b48190a3e8e49a5ef62b4a completed March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:38 p.m.