Triple

T5014333
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Trade Act of 1974 E112703 entity
Predicate linksPolicyArea P7262 FINISHED
Object trade policy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trade policy | Statement: [Trade Act of 1974, linksPolicyArea, trade policy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linksPolicyArea
Context triple: [Trade Act of 1974, linksPolicyArea, trade policy]
  • A. commonPolicyArea
    Indicates that two entities share the same policy domain, topic, or area of regulatory or legislative focus.
  • B. isPartOfPolicyArea
    Indicates that one policy, topic, or issue belongs to, falls under, or is categorized within a broader policy area or domain.
  • C. coversPolicyArea
    Indicates that a policy, document, or initiative includes or addresses a particular policy area or topic within its scope.
  • D. hasPolicyArea chosen
    Indicates that an entity (such as a policy, program, or initiative) is associated with or pertains to a specific policy area or domain.
  • E. influencedPolicyArea
    Indicates that one entity has affected, shaped, or guided the development, direction, or implementation of a particular policy area associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4434acb8819086679dbeccc2fe54 completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd7310c5b08190a5c9ab0f9fe9569f completed March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd714cbc448190aa53a8a83d768b64 completed March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:35 p.m.