Triple

T5013211
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject John Jones E112675 entity
Predicate riskAssociatedWithUse P26874 FINISHED
Object criminal prosecution LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: criminal prosecution | Statement: [John Jones, riskAssociatedWithUse, criminal prosecution]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: riskAssociatedWithUse
Context triple: [John Jones, riskAssociatedWithUse, criminal prosecution]
  • A. riskType
    Indicates the category or nature of risk associated with an entity, event, or relationship.
  • B. riskAddressed
    Indicates that a particular risk has been identified and is being mitigated, managed, or otherwise handled by an associated action, control, or measure.
  • C. riskFeature
    Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a characteristic, condition, or attribute that increases the likelihood or severity of a negative outcome for another entity or situation.
  • D. riskBasis chosen
    Indicates the underlying factor, condition, or rationale that forms the basis for assessing or assigning risk in a given context.
  • E. riskTaken
    Indicates that an entity has undertaken an action or decision involving exposure to potential loss, harm, or uncertainty.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4434acb8819086679dbeccc2fe54 completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd730f12a481908a27c15dc73987c6 completed March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd714cbc448190aa53a8a83d768b64 completed March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:35 p.m.