Triple
T5013201
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John Jones |
E112675
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedLegalOutcome |
P30903
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John Darwin conviction for fraud |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Darwin conviction for fraud | Statement: [John Jones, relatedLegalOutcome, John Darwin conviction for fraud]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedLegalOutcome Context triple: [John Jones, relatedLegalOutcome, John Darwin conviction for fraud]
-
A.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
C.
relatedLegalProcess
Indicates that there is an associated legal proceeding or action that is connected to, arises from, or is otherwise relevant to the referenced entity or event.
-
D.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
E.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4434acb8819086679dbeccc2fe54 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd730f12a481908a27c15dc73987c6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd714cbc448190aa53a8a83d768b64 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:35 p.m.