Triple

T5007445
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Styx E112530 entity
Predicate surfaceGeologyKnown P60810 FINISHED
Object limited LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limited | Statement: [Styx, surfaceGeologyKnown, limited]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: surfaceGeologyKnown
Context triple: [Styx, surfaceGeologyKnown, limited]
  • A. geologicalStatus
    Indicates the current geological condition or classification of an entity, such as its formation state, activity level, or structural status within the Earth’s crust.
  • B. geologicalFormation
    Indicates that one entity is a geological structure or feature that characterizes or composes the physical makeup of another entity.
  • C. hasGeologicalSignificance
    Indicates that something possesses notable importance or relevance within a geological context, such as Earth’s structure, history, or processes.
  • D. geologyIncludes
    Indicates that one geological entity contains, encompasses, or has as a component another geological entity.
  • E. geologicalSystem
    Indicates that one entity is a geological system (e.g., rock units, structures, or processes forming a coherent geologic framework) associated with or characterizing the other entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4433d0b08190877e83959ef40d81 completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd730a7590819088ab8d49c5c88c2f completed March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd714cbc448190aa53a8a83d768b64 completed March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd73089f548190834103366e24ab40 completed March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:35 p.m.