Triple

T498317
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ALGOL W E10343 entity
Predicate hasSyntaxStyle P5327 FINISHED
Object ALGOL-like block structure LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ALGOL-like block structure | Statement: [ALGOL W, hasSyntaxStyle, ALGOL-like block structure]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSyntaxStyle
Context triple: [ALGOL W, hasSyntaxStyle, ALGOL-like block structure]
  • A. hasStyle
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
  • B. hasSubstyle
    Indicates that one style is a more specific or subordinate variant of another style within a hierarchical style structure.
  • C. hasStyleGuide
    Indicates that one entity is associated with or governed by a particular style guide that defines its formatting or presentation conventions.
  • D. hasHigherStyleThan
    Indicates that one entity’s style is considered superior or more fashionable than another’s.
  • E. syntaxBasedOn chosen
    Indicates that the syntactic structure or rules of one entity are derived from, influenced by, or constructed according to the syntax of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e847df8481909239ec08ccf1e376 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2f1183e988190bce70932a9678134 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edfa87cc8190a77c726a5a55b7d9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.