Triple
T4980100
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wireshark |
E111861
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsProtocolCount |
P45788
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hundreds of network protocols |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hundreds of network protocols | Statement: [Wireshark, supportsProtocolCount, hundreds of network protocols]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsProtocolCount Context triple: [Wireshark, supportsProtocolCount, hundreds of network protocols]
-
A.
protocolCount
chosen
Indicates the number of distinct protocols associated with, used by, or defined for a given entity or context.
-
B.
supportedProtocol
Indicates that one entity is compatible with, implements, or can operate using a specified communication or interaction protocol.
-
C.
hasProtocol
Indicates that an entity uses, follows, or is governed by a specified protocol or set of procedural rules.
-
D.
supportsDeviceCount
Indicates the number of devices that a system, service, or component is capable of supporting concurrently.
-
E.
supportsMultipleDataAndDisplayProtocols
Indicates that an entity is capable of handling more than one type of data protocol and more than one type of display protocol.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd441adc208190b70a033a0741d01e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd730a7590819088ab8d49c5c88c2f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd7146e6e881908a55ab2756b631f6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:33 p.m.