Triple
T4980054
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kismet |
E111860
|
entity |
| Predicate | canDecryptTraffic |
P60775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no, unless keys are provided externally |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no, unless keys are provided externally | Statement: [Kismet, canDecryptTraffic, no, unless keys are provided externally]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canDecryptTraffic Context triple: [Kismet, canDecryptTraffic, no, unless keys are provided externally]
-
A.
supportsParallelDecryption
Indicates that one entity enables or is compatible with decrypting multiple items or data streams simultaneously.
-
B.
canCrackEncryption
Indicates that an entity has the capability to break or bypass the encryption protecting another entity’s data or communications.
-
C.
hasCrypt
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a crypt belonging to or located within it.
-
D.
usesEncryptionAlgorithm
Indicates that one entity applies or relies on a specific encryption algorithm to protect data or communications.
-
E.
supportsCipherSuite
Indicates that one entity is capable of using or handling a specified cryptographic cipher suite in secure communications.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd441adc208190b70a033a0741d01e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd730a7590819088ab8d49c5c88c2f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd7146e6e881908a55ab2756b631f6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd73089f548190834103366e24ab40 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:33 p.m.