Triple
T4972003
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | special statute region |
E111673
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFiscalBenefit |
P2188
|
FINISHED |
| Object | greater retention of locally raised taxes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: greater retention of locally raised taxes | Statement: [special statute region, hasFiscalBenefit, greater retention of locally raised taxes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFiscalBenefit Context triple: [special statute region, hasFiscalBenefit, greater retention of locally raised taxes]
-
A.
hasBenefit
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides an advantage, improvement, or positive outcome to another entity.
-
B.
benefitTaxStatus
Indicates that an entity’s tax-related status or classification provides a financial or regulatory benefit in the context of the relationship.
-
C.
benefitsState
Indicates that one entity provides an advantage, improvement, or positive outcome to a state or governmental entity.
-
D.
haveFiscalPowers
Indicates that an entity possesses legal authority or control over financial or budgetary matters.
-
E.
benefitAdministered
Indicates that a benefit (such as aid, service, or entitlement) has been formally provided or delivered to an eligible recipient by an administering party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd441a0eb481908050fa4273b19eae |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd730a7590819088ab8d49c5c88c2f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd7146e6e881908a55ab2756b631f6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:33 p.m.