Triple

T4972001
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject special statute region E111673 entity
Predicate statuteHasRank P52981 FINISHED
Object constitutional law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constitutional law | Statement: [special statute region, statuteHasRank, constitutional law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statuteHasRank
Context triple: [special statute region, statuteHasRank, constitutional law]
  • A. hasLegalRank chosen
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific legal status, classification, or rank within a formal legal or regulatory system.
  • B. legalHierarchyRank
    Indicates the relative position or level of authority an entity holds within a legal or judicial hierarchy.
  • C. hasRankCategory
    Indicates that an entity is assigned to a particular rank-based classification or level within an ordered hierarchy.
  • D. hasRankingUnit
    Indicates that one entity is associated with a specific unit or scale used to express its ranking or ordered position.
  • E. eligibleRank
    Indicates that an entity meets the required rank or level criteria to qualify for a specific role, action, or benefit.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd441a0eb481908050fa4273b19eae completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd730a7590819088ab8d49c5c88c2f completed March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd7146e6e881908a55ab2756b631f6 completed March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:33 p.m.