Triple
T4971394
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Coryell |
E111658
|
entity |
| Predicate | mentionedIn |
P831
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Corfield v. Coryell opinion by Justice Bushrod Washington |
E15220
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Corfield v. Coryell opinion by Justice Bushrod Washington | Statement: [Coryell, mentionedIn, Corfield v. Coryell opinion by Justice Bushrod Washington]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Corfield v. Coryell opinion by Justice Bushrod Washington Context triple: [Coryell, mentionedIn, Corfield v. Coryell opinion by Justice Bushrod Washington]
-
A.
Corfield v. Coryell
chosen
Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
-
B.
Camfield v. United States
Camfield v. United States is an 1897 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority under the Property Clause to regulate the use of privately owned lands when necessary to protect adjacent public lands.
-
C.
Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852)
The Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing certain local regulations affecting interstate commerce when they address inherently local matters.
-
D.
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
-
E.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd441a0eb481908050fa4273b19eae |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7213bf0081909b3c496f1804dc4c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:13 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69be81fa9108819089a6258e3a88f0cb |
completed | March 21, 2026, 11:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:33 p.m.