Triple

T4951010
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Navreh E111166 entity
Predicate hasIntangibleHeritageType P43647 FINISHED
Object ritual practice LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ritual practice | Statement: [Navreh, hasIntangibleHeritageType, ritual practice]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIntangibleHeritageType
Context triple: [Navreh, hasIntangibleHeritageType, ritual practice]
  • A. hasCulturalSiteType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified by, a specific type or category of cultural site.
  • B. UNESCIntangibleHeritage
    Indicates that something is recognized or designated as part of UNESCO’s list of Intangible Cultural Heritage, reflecting protected or celebrated cultural practices, expressions, or traditions.
  • C. intangibleHeritageDomain chosen
    Indicates that something belongs to, or is categorized within, a specific domain or category of intangible cultural heritage.
  • D. hasHeritageValueFor
    Indicates that something possesses cultural, historical, or heritage significance for a particular entity or community.
  • E. heritageType
    Indicates the classification of an entity’s cultural or natural heritage category or type within a heritage framework.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd441721cc819085c7e33fe0876818 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd71b561ec81908083225269222e96 completed March 20, 2026, 4:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd6c3aa1388190b3e0c8ee1ba1e4fa completed March 20, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:31 p.m.