Triple
T4941340
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miraitowa |
E110940
|
entity |
| Predicate | designPattern |
P8034
|
FINISHED |
| Object | indigo blue ichimatsu checkered pattern |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: indigo blue ichimatsu checkered pattern | Statement: [Miraitowa, designPattern, indigo blue ichimatsu checkered pattern]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designPattern Context triple: [Miraitowa, designPattern, indigo blue ichimatsu checkered pattern]
-
A.
designMethod
Indicates that one entity is used as the method, approach, or technique by which another entity is designed or created.
-
B.
pattern
chosen
Indicates that one entity exhibits, follows, or is characterized by a particular recurring form, structure, or arrangement associated with another entity.
-
C.
designModel
Indicates that one entity creates, specifies, or defines the structure or behavior of another entity as a model or blueprint.
-
D.
designDescription
Indicates that an entity has a textual explanation or summary of its design, structure, or intended configuration.
-
E.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4415eee08190bdce70276e56a5b4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd708ba9888190baf4e79c8f159e9f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c389b9881908ad7fb1c5393c1b1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:31 p.m.