Triple

T493039
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rails-to-Trails Conservancy E10229 entity
Predicate TrailLinkIs P14127 FINISHED
Object online trail-finder database LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: online trail-finder database | Statement: [Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, TrailLinkIs, online trail-finder database]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: TrailLinkIs
Context triple: [Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, TrailLinkIs, online trail-finder database]
  • A. hasNearbyTrailheadFor
    Indicates that one location has a trailhead situated close enough to serve as a convenient access point for another location.
  • B. hasNearbyTrail
    Indicates that one entity is located close to or within a short distance of a trail.
  • C. hasRailTrail
    Indicates that one location or entity possesses, includes, or is connected by a rail trail (a recreational trail converted from or running along a former or existing railway corridor) to another location or entity.
  • D. hasTrail
    Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a trail or pathway.
  • E. linkedByRoadTo
    Indicates that two locations are directly connected to each other by a road suitable for travel.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e847df8481909239ec08ccf1e376 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2f0faab4881909f65f172198b5bd2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edf7ce008190836fb6ab5ea39375 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2eebb2c908190960a4d0c014304cd completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.